Of religions and of not-religious being mistaken for moral and wise because lack of social eye

 Of religions I have learned that a large part of it is civiluced wisdom, especially wishing well in the wide world, with good quality objectivity supporting it, for example telling that fair play is important kn practice: so like in market economies, one sees what produces what, so it makes it possible to invest in benefical optiobs that the times need. Objectivity is backed up by sensitive observations, civiliced wisdom of good quality and healthy wisdom of life. Often a religious person gets much of one's wisdom and of the presumed effect of one's relugiousness from civiliced wisdom, very large amounts of civiliced wisdom, high quality objectivity, good will in the world, much responsible attitude and lots of wisdom of life.

 But it often happens that others cannot estimate the amount of such wisdom of each individual, and so they jyst mark religion important instead of the values and wusdom important, and so it often happens that they guess something unclear but somehow blurred as if feeling and steady to be religiousness, and so they ghink that they ought to support such kibd of blindly, give it wisdom's place and values' place, and so such an individual often gets lots of social positiln over wisdom and over moral, and so it ends up suppirting shit, evil, social dominance, bacteria, attacks like killing, malicious lies, acting instead of sincere relations, commanding by lues instead of honesty and each individual's own wishes deciding about their lives. So one must jyst say that it isn't religion anymore, it is some lues and sociaö musperceptilns playing on the unaknoledged kniwledge of the world being of spirit and people mostly opposing civiliced values and the good of the future generations.