It is a species characteristic for humans to have a landscape like view

 Standing and walking on two feet, resembles how a mouse rises to two feet when it wants to take a look of the wider environment, of the landscape it is in. It seems, judging by human bodily structure and ways of moving, that a human tends to want such a wide landscape like view of ghe environment, and that humans are specialiced to living just about all the time with the guidance of such a landscape like view. 

(19.2.2024   Mysocial space to live in does not carry this subject, it just interests others with more social inclination. I ought to stop writing but feel forced to it. The reason seems to me having figured out easy ways to study kind of school taught things. But you should read my numerous earlier texts and not demand anything more from me.) 

So if some people refuse to take into account the whole, a landscape like picture of the world, can it be that there is soul wandering and they have somehow born or otherwise mistakenly changed to human form, when they ought to have changed to slme animal or other being not needing to respect a landscape lije view. For example an engineer only might be sitting like a mouse or rat, but anyway respect a landscape like picture of the world. And one always coming near without regard to what one causes to the other, could have born a small insect needing the warmth of a human or other big animal. 

*

One very much social and taking sides, using only some parts of perspective, might be a parasite of a cat. Cat living with humans ought not attack eyes. It is likely that cats' characteristics are somehow wrong, since a cat seems to behave like a clumsy rigidly moving person. 

One attacking soft ones might be a crocodile? 

One wanting to destroy all with pictures of wholes in sight, might be an animal specialiced into digging tunnels to the ground and living in them, like a mole or a worm. 

One attacking things in a seen landscaoe would not have an erect posture like human, but instead a more forward leaning mostly without such a wide view. Is jaguar such a predator? 

One wanting to always have a role would maybe be one hiding, almost invisible, or one wanting to live fully according to the local environment and local traditional culture, for example without disturbing the nature at all. Or like one wanting to learn to live wisely according to the advices of birds. If there is no such idea of respecting fully the wisdom around, it would maybe be suited to bacteria. Or a sneakingly attacking animal, like a tiger for example, but is the total effect too big, especially in the long run, and is the effect toward wiser views and good living conditions for all fairly now and in the future? 

Ones inclined almost solely toward eating, without so much wisdom of life, almost always would like life in a warmer climate, often find even tropics nice. 

*

A landscape like view is just watching. It is not dominating like a big strong among somewhat smaller ones that are near by. A landscape like view makes it possible to take things into account, and so to live leisurely while being aware of the envuronment. This way of living coubts on coordinating the whole so that catastrophes are prevented beforehand and ways of living and doing are free and with wisdom of life and wisdom about the whole, so that their wishes fit together without problems and they cooperate in a free harmonious way helped by communication at the level of pictures of the world, and seen etc observations about individuals' ways of doing etc, and maybe a music like perspective (from birds? Or somehow such idea but in human pictures of the world, like in the form of songs memorised knowledge of ways of living at the level of experience, to pass some of that beauty and richness of life to the next generations, in a wise form) about good ways of doing, motivations, etc. 

*

*

9th of February 2024   My text "Animals In Space: Inhabiting new planets", see https://learntalents.blogspot.com/2023/11/animals-in-space.html . The text is also available as a booklet at www.amazon.com . It is a nice, relieving kind of text, it seems. 

*

Obs. Read this only after the above booklet, if you want to learn this skill : 

Mars, photosynthezis by the skin, and green colour

It is said that in Mars the atmosphere is largely carbondiokside, which means that plants could propably flourish there, and such is also told of the Earth a long long time ago. Martian people are said to be green. If one copies from the atmosphere of a healthy pine brach with green needless, the atmosphere near the needless, as if moist air there, like an aura, thinking of the tree as a model for oneself in transforming one's life permanently toward photozynthezis ability in, near or on one's skin,  and another picture more blurredly in mind that of a green Martian, and such a model by the skin of one's arm, it feels as if the tree as a forefigure had given a feeling of fresh oxygen in the arm a few centimeters from the skin, maybe nearby arm fully at least a little bit.

Green colour of a coat or hair seems to connect with an elderly thknking tjings overly, much too much poorly in lufe around and trying to cure such with one's wisdom, but caring for things wider too, kind of aiming at adding good quality wisdom of life for a wider area too, kind of wisdom for the society, like for boys in the old times' adventure books maybe. So even though such seems to connect to plants' refreshing effect, and is maybe needed in Mars, it maybe isn't necessarily needed for photosynthezis. 

Just came to my mind: if humans too could learn to produce oxygen from carbondiokside this way on one's skin, copying from the photosynthezis of plants, could that lower the carbondiokside levels in rooms and in town environments so much that it would counteract global warming? 

* 

23rd of March 2024   A species or an individual of it developing to a new species with different characteristics is different from malformation (which seem to be caused by some normal basic life being replaced by clumsy keeping company or the like, so the body gets clumsier too, like skills deteriorate if never used). In developing to a new species the new characteristics are likely to develop via serious reaching for, like if a fish comes to land, it by turning this way and that way can maybe soon return to the sea. If some type of fishes like .oving on land such short distancies, maybe they hobby like develop skills for such, are motivated to developing such skills. So maybe some learn to move on land with their stomach side undermost. And so they maybe learn balance and tend to think that somewhat sturdy finns would help them in keeping upright and moving. And so maybe in a group of young or young adult fishes they would try to reach for, train their finns to support them well in moving, maybe rise a little bit on them, and so across time via such inclination they woukd develop legs, and maybe a skin that bears sometines a little bit of dryness (from the weather skills of the four seasons I know that such is like balancing on tunings of the (maybe thicker, more layeredly thought of) skin & water etc balances & states of mind & ways of doing, goals, values, etc that appear and feel good both in the short term and in longer term). And so they could across time develop both in skills, observatilnal abilities and in their physical characteristics toward life on land. One develoos in skills via sincere interest in them, not via slumber like taking part or trying to bear while too ill to behave wisely.